Nassr v R [2015] NSWCCA 284
Conviction on count 1 was quashed and a judgment of acquittal directed because the element that the serious indictable offence was committed 'in the dwelling-house' was not established by the agreed facts or evidence, resulting in a miscarriage of justice.
- Parties
- Applicant: Edward Nassr; Crown: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; acquittal entered on count 1; aggregate sentence set aside; matter remitted for sentencing on remaining count; procedural orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Miscarriage of Justice, Breaking and Entering, Aggravated Offence, Elements of Offence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Nassr
Applicant
Regina
Crown
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for breaking and entering and committing a serious indictable offence 'therein' could be supported on the admitted facts
- 2 Whether a miscarriage of justice occurred due to conviction based on agreed facts that did not disclose all elements of the offence
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction on count 1 was quashed and a judgment of acquittal directed because the element that the serious indictable offence was committed 'in the dwelling-house' was not established by the agreed facts or evidence, resulting in a miscarriage of justice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; acquittal entered on count 1; aggregate sentence set aside; matter remitted for sentencing on remaining count; procedural orders made.
Orders
- Amend order 2 made on 4 November 2015 to read: '2. Allow the appeal in relation to the applicant's conviction on count 1, quash that conviction and direct a judgment of acquittal be entered in relation to that count.'
- Revoke order 3 made on 4 November 2015.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment