Re Amazon Pest Control Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1590
Amending the judgment under the slip rule to reduce the amount, after judgment has been authorised and before bankruptcy, is not a prohibited fresh step under Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 58(3), and thus is permissible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Consequential Orders (other Than Costs) / Application to Amend Judgment Pursuant to Slip Rule, Post Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders amended pursuant to slip rule; judgment sum reduced.
- Legal Topics
- ['slip Rule' 'judgment Amendment' 'calculation Mistake' 'fresh Step After Bankruptcy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Consequential Orders (other Than Costs) / Application to Amend Judgment Pursuant to Slip Rule, Post Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['whether the Court can amend the judgment sum under the slip rule after defendant became bankrupt' 'whether the formal judgment order was irregular or invalid' 'whether the amendment is a prohibited fresh step under Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 58(3)']
Ratio Decidendi
Amending the judgment under the slip rule to reduce the amount, after judgment has been authorised and before bankruptcy, is not a prohibited fresh step under Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 58(3), and thus is permissible.
Court Disposition
Orders amended pursuant to slip rule; judgment sum reduced.
Orders
- ['Order 1(a) amended to $1,069,125.73.' 'Order 1(b) amended to $488,916.48.' "The last line of order 2 amended to 'The final judgment sum is thus $1,558,042.21.'"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment