EDWARDS v PACIFIC EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING PTY LTD [1996] NSWCA 168

EDWARDS v PACIFIC EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING PTY LTD [1996] NSWCA 168

Leave to appeal should not be given as no sufficiently arguable issue of principle nor error of law was demonstrated; the earlier judgment appears correct and there is no basis for granting leave in relation to the other matters.

Parties
Applicant: Edwards; Respondent: Pacific Equipment Manufacturing Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 July 1996
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edwards

Applicant

Pacific Equipment Manufacturing Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Interlocutory Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the decision of Judge Wall (14 March 1996) and other listed decisions

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal should not be given as no sufficiently arguable issue of principle nor error of law was demonstrated; the earlier judgment appears correct and there is no basis for granting leave in relation to the other matters.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal (summons) is dismissed.
  • The application is dismissed with costs.