Spence v Waverley Council [2021] NSWLEC 1214
The proposed driveway across the wide grassed verge would introduce a new and uncharacteristic element into the streetscape of Keiran Street, significantly impacting its character and the heritage values of the Mill Hill Conservation Area. The development is inconsistent with applicable controls and objectives in the Development Control Plan and Local Environmental Plan, and its detrimental visual and heritage impacts render the application unacceptable on its merits. Accordingly, development consent should be refused and the appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; development application refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'heritage Conservation' 'streetscape Impact' 'off Street Car Parking' 'environmental Planning' 'visual Impact Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development would have an unacceptable impact on the streetscape of Keiran Street' 'Whether the proposed development would adversely affect the heritage significance of the Mill Hill Conservation Area' 'Whether the development application complies with planning controls and development control plan provisions' 'Whether approval would be contrary to the public interest or establish an undesirable precedent']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed driveway across the wide grassed verge would introduce a new and uncharacteristic element into the streetscape of Keiran Street, significantly impacting its character and the heritage values of the Mill Hill Conservation Area. The development is inconsistent with applicable controls and objectives in the Development Control Plan and Local Environmental Plan, and its detrimental visual and heritage impacts render the application unacceptable on its merits. Accordingly, development consent should be refused and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; development application refused.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'Development Application No. DA-167/2020 for the partial demolition of the side fence and the construction of a hardstand car space, driveway and sliding timber gate to the rear of 75 Newland Street Bondi Junction is refused.' 'The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibits 4,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment