EE v Protective Commissioner and ors (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 35
The appeal should be allowed to the merits and the Appeal Panel should consider the previously omitted evidence. Given Ms X's financial interests and the state of the Toongabbie property, the preferable decision is to sell the Toongabbie property and discontinue the sale of the Winston Hills property.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Tribunal decision set aside and substituted with sale of the Toongabbie property and discontinuance of sale of the Winston Hills property.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal—merits Review' 'sale of Property of Protected Person']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether appeal should be extended to a review of the merits' 'Whether critical evidence was omitted at first instance' "Which property should be sold to discharge debts and provide for Ms X's welfare"]
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal should be allowed to the merits and the Appeal Panel should consider the previously omitted evidence. Given Ms X's financial interests and the state of the Toongabbie property, the preferable decision is to sell the Toongabbie property and discontinue the sale of the Winston Hills property.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Tribunal decision set aside and substituted with sale of the Toongabbie property and discontinuance of sale of the Winston Hills property.
Orders
- ["Leave is granted for the appeal to extend to the merits of the Tribunal's decision." "The Tribunal's decision of 21 January 2008 is set aside." 'A decision is made to sell the property at Toongabbie and discontinue the sale of the property at Winston Hills.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment