EF v R [2015] NSWCCA 36
The sentencing judge erred by failing to consider the availability and suitability of an intensive correction order, as required by s 5(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), and the sentence imposed was thereby unreasonable and plainly unjust. The court allowed the appeal, resentenced EF to a suspended term of imprisonment with release on a good behaviour bond for the sentence duration.
- Parties
- Applicant: EF; Crown: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Appeal and Resentencing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, leave to appeal against sentence granted, applicant resentenced.
- Legal Topics
- Manifestly Excessive Sentence, Intensive Correction Order, Sentencing Discretion, Special Circumstances, Resentencing, Good Behaviour Bond
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EF
Applicant
Regina
Crown
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Appeal and Resentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to consider alternative sentencing options such as an intensive correction order
- 3 Whether exceptional circumstances existed warranting non-custodial sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by failing to consider the availability and suitability of an intensive correction order, as required by s 5(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), and the sentence imposed was thereby unreasonable and plainly unjust. The court allowed the appeal, resentenced EF to a suspended term of imprisonment with release on a good behaviour bond for the sentence duration.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, leave to appeal against sentence granted, applicant resentenced.
Orders
- Allow leave to appeal against sentence
- Allow the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment