EFG Australia Limited & Ors. v. Kennedy & Ors. [1999] NSWSC 922

EFG Australia Limited & Ors. v. Kennedy & Ors. [1999] NSWSC 922

Mr. Phillips, as a senior employee with fiduciary duties, received undisclosed payments and profits related to the Glenmore Park joint venture. These benefits were not subject to informed consent by the employer, and the conduct was in conflict with his fiduciary obligations. As such, this justified immediate dismissal and an order that he account for the profits and payments to the plaintiffs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 September 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffs; cross-claim dismissed
Legal Topics
['contract of Service' 'fiduciary Obligations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment at First Instance

  1. 1 ['Whether Mr. Phillips owed fiduciary duties to the plaintiffs' 'Whether Mr. Phillips procured financial benefits for himself or associated companies during employment' 'Whether Mr. Phillips breached any duty to the plaintiffs' "Whether EFG Treasury was entitled to terminate Mr. Phillips' employment" 'Remedies available to the plaintiffs or cross-claimant']

Ratio Decidendi

Mr. Phillips, as a senior employee with fiduciary duties, received undisclosed payments and profits related to the Glenmore Park joint venture. These benefits were not subject to informed consent by the employer, and the conduct was in conflict with his fiduciary obligations. As such, this justified immediate dismissal and an order that he account for the profits and payments to the plaintiffs.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs; cross-claim dismissed

Orders

  • ['Mr. Phillips to account for payments and profits as specified, with interest;' 'Cross-claim dismissed;' "Mr. Phillips to pay plaintiffs' costs referable to claims and cross-claim."]