EFY v Children’s Guardian [2020] NSWCATAD 178
Tribunal has no jurisdiction to conduct a further review of the decision by the Children's Guardian to cancel the applicant’s WWCC clearance, as it has already been reviewed and determined. Refusal to permit an early application does not constitute a refusal of clearance and cannot be reviewed by the Tribunal under relevant statutory provisions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Tribunal Review / Summary Dismissal Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check Clearance' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal' 'cancellation Vs Refusal of Clearance' 'early Application Provisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Tribunal Review / Summary Dismissal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicant is entitled to seek further review of WWCC cancellation decision' "Whether refusal by Children's Guardian to allow early application constitutes refusal of clearance" 'Whether Tribunal has jurisdiction to review early application refusal under relevant statutory provisions']
Ratio Decidendi
Tribunal has no jurisdiction to conduct a further review of the decision by the Children's Guardian to cancel the applicant’s WWCC clearance, as it has already been reviewed and determined. Refusal to permit an early application does not constitute a refusal of clearance and cannot be reviewed by the Tribunal under relevant statutory provisions.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The proceedings are dismissed pursuant to section 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment