EFY v Children’s Guardian [2020] NSWCATAD 178

EFY v Children’s Guardian [2020] NSWCATAD 178

Tribunal has no jurisdiction to conduct a further review of the decision by the Children's Guardian to cancel the applicant’s WWCC clearance, as it has already been reviewed and determined. Refusal to permit an early application does not constitute a refusal of clearance and cannot be reviewed by the Tribunal under relevant statutory provisions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 July 2020
Procedural Posture
Administrative Tribunal Review / Summary Dismissal Application
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['working With Children Check Clearance' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal' 'cancellation Vs Refusal of Clearance' 'early Application Provisions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Administrative Tribunal Review / Summary Dismissal Application

  1. 1 ['Whether applicant is entitled to seek further review of WWCC cancellation decision' "Whether refusal by Children's Guardian to allow early application constitutes refusal of clearance" 'Whether Tribunal has jurisdiction to review early application refusal under relevant statutory provisions']

Ratio Decidendi

Tribunal has no jurisdiction to conduct a further review of the decision by the Children's Guardian to cancel the applicant’s WWCC clearance, as it has already been reviewed and determined. Refusal to permit an early application does not constitute a refusal of clearance and cannot be reviewed by the Tribunal under relevant statutory provisions.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The proceedings are dismissed pursuant to section 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).']