EGV17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1941
The proposed ground of appeal lacks merit or intelligible substance, and there is no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's or Federal Circuit Court's decisions; therefore, the application for extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal is refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: EGV17; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Determination of Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Protection Visas, Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Interpretation of Credibility, Jurisdictional Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EGV17
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Determination of Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to seek leave to appeal from an interlocutory decision of the Federal Circuit Court
- 2 Whether there is a proper basis for leave to appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of the application
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed ground of appeal lacks merit or intelligible substance, and there is no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's or Federal Circuit Court's decisions; therefore, the application for extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal is refused.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal refused with costs.
Orders
- The application for an extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal be refused.
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs, to be assessed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment