EHB17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1280

EHB17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1280

The application for extension of time was dismissed because the applicant’s proposed appeal had no prospect of success, was without merit, failed to demonstrate jurisdictional error, misdirection, denial of fairness or bias, and provided only unparticularised grounds.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application for extension of time dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'bias']
['migration' 'administrative Law'] ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'bias']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an extension of time to appeal should be granted' 'Whether the applicant established jurisdictional error' 'Whether the applicant established bias or denial of procedural fairness' 'Whether the appeal has merit']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time was dismissed because the applicant’s proposed appeal had no prospect of success, was without merit, failed to demonstrate jurisdictional error, misdirection, denial of fairness or bias, and provided only unparticularised grounds.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time is dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent fixed in the amount of $1,756.00 within three months.']