EJJ v Children’s Guardian [2021] NSWCATAD 80
EJJ is not a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012, due to the passage of time since the offences, absence of subsequent offending, demonstration of insight, and consideration of all mandatory statutory factors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Enabling order granted; previous decision set aside
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Checks' 'disqualifying Offences' 'enabling Order' 'risk Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether EJJ should be granted an enabling order under s 28 of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012' 'Whether EJJ has rebutted the presumption that he poses a risk to the safety and well-being of children']
Ratio Decidendi
EJJ is not a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012, due to the passage of time since the offences, absence of subsequent offending, demonstration of insight, and consideration of all mandatory statutory factors.
Court Disposition
Enabling order granted; previous decision set aside
Orders
- ['Declare EJJ is not a disqualified person in relation to a conviction of sexual intercourse without consent (s61I of the Crimes Act 1900) on 12 May 1998 at Wollongong for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012.' "The decision of the Children's Guardian of 3 June 2020 is set aside."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment