EJW v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 326
The Tribunal found that the service of a brief of evidence by police, even if made in error, is part of the prosecution of a criminal offence, which is a core policing function. Therefore, the exemption in s 27(1) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 applies and the conduct is not subject to the Information Protection Principles. The Tribunal decided to take no further action.
- Parties
- Applicant: EJW; Respondent: Commissioner of Police
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Decision on the Papers
- Outcome
- No action taken
- Legal Topics
- Exemption Under Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act, Police Functions and Privacy, Administrative Functions of Police, Service of Brief of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EJW
Applicant
Commissioner of Police
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Decision on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exemption in s 27 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 applies to the conduct complained about
- 2 If the exemption does not apply, whether the conduct breached any of the Information Protection Principles in the Act
- 3 If breach is found, what order if any should the Tribunal make
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the service of a brief of evidence by police, even if made in error, is part of the prosecution of a criminal offence, which is a core policing function. Therefore, the exemption in s 27(1) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 applies and the conduct is not subject to the Information Protection Principles. The Tribunal decided to take no further action.
Court Disposition
No action taken
Orders
- Pursuant to s 55(2) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 no action will be taken on the matter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment