Elali v Campbelltown City Council [2004] NSWLEC 554
The Land and Environment Court has the power, under cl 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 as applied by s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, to permit amendments to a development application before its determination, so long as the amendments do not result in a proposal that is essentially a new development application. The amendments in this case were found to be within the scope of that power, involving a substantial reduction in scale but retaining essential characteristics of the original proposal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal / Interlocutory (notice of Motion to Amend Development Application)
- Outcome
- Court holds it has power to grant relief sought but withholds making final orders to allow Council to raise any discretionary matters or agree to the amendments.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Amendment' 'jurisdiction to Permit Amendment' 'scope of Power Under Cl 55 Ep&a Regulation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal / Interlocutory (notice of Motion to Amend Development Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Land and Environment Court has power to permit amendment to a development application under cl 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000' 'Proper construction and application of cl 55 of the EP&A Regulation' 'Whether amendments constitute a new application or are within the statutory power of amendment']
Ratio Decidendi
The Land and Environment Court has the power, under cl 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 as applied by s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, to permit amendments to a development application before its determination, so long as the amendments do not result in a proposal that is essentially a new development application. The amendments in this case were found to be within the scope of that power, involving a substantial reduction in scale but retaining essential characteristics of the original proposal.
Court Disposition
Court holds it has power to grant relief sought but withholds making final orders to allow Council to raise any discretionary matters or agree to the amendments.
Orders
- ["Stand over question of exercise of the power in favour of the Applicant until 14 October 2004; liberty to restore on two days' notice."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment