Keller v Hand [2006] NSWSC 1224

Keller v Hand [2006] NSWSC 1224

On the evidence, the plaintiff made substantially greater financial contributions, including a gift from her mother intended for her sole benefit, which should be credited to her. While both parties made non-financial contributions and household contributions, the overall balance favored an adjustment in the plaintiff’s favor. The defendant was awarded $140,000 by way of adjustment, with both parties retaining their respective superannuation, cars, and personal effects. The parties were to bear their own costs.

Parties
Plaintiff: Eleanor Margaret Keller; Defendant: Penelope Hand
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Application for Property Adjustment Under Property (relationships) Act 1984 / Final Hearing and Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Adjustment of property interests ordered; plaintiff to pay defendant $140,000; parties each to pay own costs.
Legal Topics
Adjustment of Property Interests, De Facto Relationships, Financial and Non Financial Contributions, Domestic Relationship Agreements, Property (relationships) Act 1984 S 20
Equity Family Law Adjustment of Property Interests De Facto Relationships Financial and Non Financial Contributions Domestic Relationship Agreements Property (relationships) Act 1984 S 20

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 18
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eleanor Margaret Keller

Plaintiff

Penelope Hand

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Property Adjustment Under Property (relationships) Act 1984 / Final Hearing and Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Entitlement to adjustment of property under s 20 of Property (Relationships) Act 1984
  2. 2 Assessment of financial and non-financial contributions of the parties
  3. 3 Effect of domestic relationship agreement lacking statutory certificates

Ratio Decidendi

On the evidence, the plaintiff made substantially greater financial contributions, including a gift from her mother intended for her sole benefit, which should be credited to her. While both parties made non-financial contributions and household contributions, the overall balance favored an adjustment in the plaintiff’s favor. The defendant was awarded $140,000 by way of adjustment, with both parties retaining their respective superannuation, cars, and personal effects. The parties were to bear their own costs.

Court Disposition

Adjustment of property interests ordered; plaintiff to pay defendant $140,000; parties each to pay own costs.

Orders

  • Plaintiff to pay defendant $140,000 by way of property adjustment.
  • Plaintiff retains the Lilyfield property, subject to refinancing the mortgage as required to provide the defendant's release.