Electic v Todaytech [2003] NSWSC 211

Electic v Todaytech [2003] NSWSC 211

There was no consideration provided by the plaintiff to support the alleged agreement to delay repayment of the debt, and the alleged offsetting claim was not quantified. Therefore, there was no genuine dispute or genuine offsetting claim in respect of the statutory demand; the application to set aside the demand was dismissed.

Parties
Plaintiff: Electic Australia Pty Limited; Defendant: Todaytech Distribution Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 March 2003
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Application to set aside statutory demand dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Genuine Dispute, Consideration, Forbearance to Sue, Offsetting Claim
Corporations Law Equity Statutory Demand Genuine Dispute Consideration Forbearance to Sue Offsetting Claim

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Electic Australia Pty Limited

Plaintiff

Todaytech Distribution Pty Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a genuine dispute as to the debt claimed in the statutory demand under the Corporations Law
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff established an offsetting claim to reduce or set aside the demand
  3. 3 Whether there was consideration to support an agreement to delay payment of the debt

Ratio Decidendi

There was no consideration provided by the plaintiff to support the alleged agreement to delay repayment of the debt, and the alleged offsetting claim was not quantified. Therefore, there was no genuine dispute or genuine offsetting claim in respect of the statutory demand; the application to set aside the demand was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application to set aside statutory demand dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application to set aside the statutory demand is dismissed.
  • Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs.