Re: Application by ElectraNet Pty Limited No 2 [2008] ACompT 2
ECCSA is a 'user or consumer intervener' under the National Electricity Law, has raised matters (specifically contesting the inclusion of $29.1 million for easement compensation costs) not adequately raised by other parties, and its members' interests are affected by the outcome. Leave to intervene is granted,...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review Under Section 71 B of the National Electricity Law / Interlocutory (application for Leave to Intervene)
- Outcome
- Leave to intervene granted on limited terms.
- Legal Topics
- ['regulatory Review' 'intervention Rights' 'asset Base Determination' 'electricity Transmission Regulation']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review Under Section 71 B of the National Electricity Law / Interlocutory (application for Leave to Intervene)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether ECCSA should be granted leave to intervene' "Whether ECCSA's interests are affected by the reviewable regulatory decision" "Whether ECCSA raised matters not addressed by the applicant or regulator regarding the inclusion of easement compensation and acquisition costs in ElectraNet's regulatory asset base"]
Ratio Decidendi
ECCSA is a 'user or consumer intervener' under the National Electricity Law, has raised matters (specifically contesting the inclusion of $29.1 million for easement compensation costs) not adequately raised by other parties, and its members' interests are affected by the outcome. Leave to intervene is granted, limited to specified matters to prevent prejudice to ElectraNet.
Court Disposition
Leave to intervene granted on limited terms.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to Energy Consumers Coalition of South Australia to intervene.' 'ECCSA limited to presenting evidence and making submissions on: (a) their contention regarding $29.1 million for easement compensation costs not being included in the RAB; (b) $52.8 million for easement acquisition or transaction costs,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment