Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers Union [2001] FCA 1600
Industrial action taken in support of claims for a proposed agreement that includes a substantive, discrete and significant claim not pertaining to the employment relationship (here, the bargaining agent's fee) is not protected action under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief granted in favour of Electrolux. Directions given for parties to file agreed or separate forms of declaratory relief. Further hearing adjourned sine die. Electrolux entitled to further relief subject to submissions.
- Legal Topics
- ['protected Industrial Action' 'certified Agreement' 'employee Entitlements' 'shop Stewards Access' "bargaining Agent's Fee" 'relationship Between Employer and Employee']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether union claims for employee entitlements, shop stewards access to employer facilities, and a bargaining agent's fee payable by non-union members pertain to the relationship of employer and employee as required for certification of an agreement under Division 2 of Part VIB of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)" 'Whether industrial action in support of claims that include a claim that does not pertain to the employment relationship is protected action under the Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Industrial action taken in support of claims for a proposed agreement that includes a substantive, discrete and significant claim not pertaining to the employment relationship (here, the bargaining agent's fee) is not protected action under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief granted in favour of Electrolux. Directions given for parties to file agreed or separate forms of declaratory relief. Further hearing adjourned sine die. Electrolux entitled to further relief subject to submissions.
Orders
- ['Within seven days the parties file an agreed form of declaratory relief; if no agreement, file separate forms and relevant submissions.' 'Applicant to file submissions for any further relief within seven days; respondents to reply within seven days thereafter.' 'Further hearing adjourned sine die.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment