Azar v Berry Kitchens P/L & Anor [2001] NSWSC 678

Azar v Berry Kitchens P/L & Anor [2001] NSWSC 678

There was a denial of natural justice because the Local Court permitted Berry Kitchens to file a late third party notice against an unrepresented litigant without inviting his response, explaining the implications, or informing him of his right to seek an adjournment for legal advice or evidence. The errors were substantial, and unresolved factual issues concerning contractual responsibility and apportionment meant that remittal was not futile.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Local Court Orders on a Third Party Notice / Judgment Allowing Appeal and Remitting Matter
Outcome
Appeal allowed against the orders made on the third party notice; matter remitted to the Local Court; Berry Kitchens ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs, if any; no suitors' fund order made.
Legal Topics
['unrepresented Litigant' 'late Filing of Third Party Notice' 'right to Object to Evidence or Seek Adjournment' 'contribution or Indemnity' 'apportionment of Liability']
['civil Procedure' 'natural Justice' 'home Building'] ['unrepresented Litigant' 'late Filing of Third Party Notice' 'right to Object to Evidence or Seek Adjournment' 'contribution or Indemnity' 'apportionment of Liability']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Local Court Orders on a Third Party Notice / Judgment Allowing Appeal and Remitting Matter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Local Court denied natural justice by allowing late filing of a third party notice without inviting the unrepresented litigant to state his attitude, explaining the implications, or advising him of his right to seek an adjournment.' 'Whether the matter should be remitted because factual issues between Berry Kitchens Pty Ltd and Elias Azar concerning responsibility for the defective granite bench top were not addressed.' 'Whether the Magistrate erred in believing himself unable to apportion responsibility between Berry Kitchens Pty Ltd and Elias Azar.']

Ratio Decidendi

There was a denial of natural justice because the Local Court permitted Berry Kitchens to file a late third party notice against an unrepresented litigant without inviting his response, explaining the implications, or informing him of his right to seek an adjournment for legal advice or evidence. The errors were substantial, and unresolved factual issues concerning contractual responsibility and apportionment meant that remittal was not futile.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed against the orders made on the third party notice; matter remitted to the Local Court; Berry Kitchens ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs, if any; no suitors' fund order made.

Orders

  • ['I allow the appeal against the orders made in the action on the third party notice by Berry Kitchens Pty Ltd against Elias Azar.' 'I remit the matter to the Local Court to be determined according to law.' "I order that the defendant in the proceedings before me, that is Berry Kitchens, should pay the plaintiff's...