Haddad v M Awad [2001] NSWCC 79
The applicant suffered injury to his neck, back and shoulders in the August 1997 accident, but only sustained compensable permanent impairment of the neck (5:100 after 50% deduction for pre-existing impairment) attributable to the work accident; there is insufficient evidence of additional compensable permanent impairment to the back or arms related to the 1997 accident.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Claim / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['permanent Impairment' 'lump Sum Compensation' 'workplace Injury' 'medical Evidence' 'credit of Witness' 'apportionment Due to Pre Existing Injury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Compensation Claim / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant suffered permanent impairment of the back, neck and arms as a result of the accident on 2 August 1997' 'Extent of apportionment for pre-existing injuries or conditions under s 68A' 'Entitlement to lump sum compensation under s 66 for impairment of neck, back, arms']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant suffered injury to his neck, back and shoulders in the August 1997 accident, but only sustained compensable permanent impairment of the neck (5:100 after 50% deduction for pre-existing impairment) attributable to the work accident; there is insufficient evidence of additional compensable permanent impairment to the back or arms related to the 1997 accident.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed
Orders
- ['Award of $2,000 lump sum compensation pursuant to s 66 for permanent impairment of the neck' "Respondent to pay applicant's medical and related expenses pursuant to s 60" "Respondent to pay applicant's costs"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment