Lorenzato v Burwood Council [2020] NSWSC 1659
Burwood Council breached its duty of care by failing to disclose in the s 149 planning certificate its 2002 policy resolution (a 'policy' restricting development due to likelihood of flooding) affecting the property. This omission was negligent and misleading. The second defendant was also liable for negligent misstatement in answers to requisitions, failing to disclose the existence of the stormwater pipe and Council's statutory rights, similarly causing loss to the plaintiff. The measure of damages is the amount by which the purchase price exceeded the market value of the land if properly disclosed. Council was also liable in nuisance for the flooding, as its negligent street drainage...
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Elisa Lorenzato; First Defendant: Burwood Council; Second Defendant: Michael Della-Franca; Cross Defendant: John Lukas
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against both first and second defendants; cross-claim by second defendant dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Negligent Misstatement, Private Nuisance, Vendor and Purchaser, Misdescription and Defects, Professional Negligence, Planning Certificates, Statutory Interpretation, Compulsory Acquisition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elisa Lorenzato
Plaintiff
Burwood Council
First Defendant
Michael Della-Franca
Second Defendant
John Lukas
Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Burwood Council was liable for negligent misstatement in a planning certificate under s 149 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW).
- 2 Whether the second defendant (vendor) was liable for negligent misstatement and/or non-disclosure in sale of land requisitions regarding the existence of a stormwater pipe and Council rights.
- 3 Whether Council was liable in nuisance for flooding caused by stormwater drainage.
Ratio Decidendi
Burwood Council breached its duty of care by failing to disclose in the s 149 planning certificate its 2002 policy resolution (a 'policy' restricting development due to likelihood of flooding) affecting the property. This omission was negligent and misleading. The second defendant was also liable for negligent misstatement in answers to requisitions, failing to disclose the existence of the stormwater pipe and Council's statutory rights, similarly causing loss to the plaintiff. The measure of damages is the amount by which the purchase price exceeded the market value of the land if properly disclosed. Council was also liable in nuisance for the flooding, as its negligent street drainage...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against both first and second defendants; cross-claim by second defendant dismissed.
Orders
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant (Burwood Council) in the sum of $1,274,000 plus interest of $726,171.06 (comprising $697,324.62 on $1,219,000 from 12 August 2011 and $28,846.44 on $55,000 from 1 March 2012).
- First defendant to pay plaintiff's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment