DODD v DPP & or [2003] NSWSC 942
The magistrate's admission of the ERISP was a proper exercise of discretion under the Evidence Act 1995 s65, applying relevant legal principles, and there is no basis for this court to intervene in or overturn the evidentiary ruling at the committal stage. Leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (summons) From Committal Evidentiary Ruling / Judgment on Leave to Appeal and Merits
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; plaintiff to pay defendant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['committal Proceedings' 'evidentiary Rulings' 'admission of Hearsay' 'discretion of Magistrate' 'appeals Under Justices Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (summons) From Committal Evidentiary Ruling / Judgment on Leave to Appeal and Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the magistrate erred in admitting the ERISP tape and transcript under s65 Evidence Act 1995' "Whether the ruling on admissibility was an 'order' to which s104(3) Justices Act applies" 'Whether the court should interfere with the magistrate’s evidentiary ruling in committal proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate's admission of the ERISP was a proper exercise of discretion under the Evidence Act 1995 s65, applying relevant legal principles, and there is no basis for this court to intervene in or overturn the evidentiary ruling at the committal stage. Leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; plaintiff to pay defendant's costs.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal be granted' 'Appeal dismissed' "Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs of the proceedings"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment