GEE v COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOSFORD & ANOR [2003] NSWCA 157

GEE v COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOSFORD & ANOR [2003] NSWCA 157

The court granted an indemnity certificate because the appeal succeeded on a question of law (the construction of the delegation), and the court below made an honest error of law without any improper conduct by the Council.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Indemnity Certificate Following Consent Orders in Appeal
Outcome
Indemnity certificate granted to first respondent; administrative amendment ordered
Legal Topics
['appeal' 'costs' "suitor's Fund" 'delegation of Authority']
['administrative Law'] ['appeal' 'costs' "suitor's Fund" 'delegation of Authority']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Indemnity Certificate Following Consent Orders in Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Council of the City of Gosford should be granted an indemnity certificate under s6 of the Suitors Fund Act 1951 after a successful appeal resolved by consent.' 'Whether the delegation of authority for granting a development consent was valid.']

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted an indemnity certificate because the appeal succeeded on a question of law (the construction of the delegation), and the court below made an honest error of law without any improper conduct by the Council.

Court Disposition

Indemnity certificate granted to first respondent; administrative amendment ordered

Orders

  • ["Council of the City of Gosford to amend the title of the consent order within 48 hours to read 'In the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal, Sydney Registry'." 'Council of the City of Gosford granted an indemnity certificate pursuant to s6 of the Suitors Fund Act 1951 in respect of the appeal by...