Weavers v Dawson [2001] NSWSC 907
On the proper construction of the will, the gift to the plaintiff was contingent on attaining twenty-five years. The case did not fall within the rule in Phipps v Ackers because there was no interim gift and no gift over, and clause 6 did not justify reading the gift as vested before the specified age.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Succession; Wills Construction / Hearing of Summons
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['wills' 'construction of Will' 'vested and Contingent Gifts' 'trustees' 'maintenance Education or Advancement of Infant Beneficiaries']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Succession; Wills Construction / Hearing of Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the will gave Elizabeth Weavers a vested gift, or a vested gift subject to divestment, before she attained the age of twenty-five years.' 'Whether clause 6 of the will supported a construction that beneficiaries became entitled to capital once they ceased to be infants.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of the will, the gift to the plaintiff was contingent on attaining twenty-five years. The case did not fall within the rule in Phipps v Ackers because there was no interim gift and no gift over, and clause 6 did not justify reading the gift as vested before the specified age.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed.
Orders
- ['The summons is dismissed.' 'The costs of both sides on a party and party basis are to be paid out of the estate.' 'The exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment