ELK Designs Newcastle Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 1088
Because the parties reached agreement to grant development consent subject to conditions, the amended plans resolved the contentions, relevant jurisdictional prerequisites were satisfied, and the proposed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application No. DA 22/0548 / Orders Made Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions; Applicant to pay Respondent's costs thrown away as agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Appeal' 'multi Dwelling Housing Development' 'amended Plans' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'costs Thrown Away']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application No. DA 22/0548 / Orders Made Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court could grant development consent to the amended Development Application in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.' 'Whether relevant jurisdictional prerequisites for granting development consent were satisfied.' "Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement to grant development consent subject to conditions, the amended plans resolved the contentions, relevant jurisdictional prerequisites were satisfied, and the proposed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions; Applicant to pay Respondent's costs thrown away as agreed or assessed.
Orders
- ["The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the Development Application pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the amount as agreed or assessed." 'The Appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. DA-22/0548 for the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment