ELK18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 321
The applicant did not appear when the proceeding was called, the Court inferred that notice of the hearing had been sent to the applicant's email address, and registry inquiries confirmed no attendance by the applicant in person or by telephone; in those circumstances the Minister's application for dismissal for want of prosecution should be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time / Hearing
- Outcome
- Extension of time application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'dismissal for Want of Prosecution' 'non Appearance at Hearing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time / Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the extension of time application should be dismissed for want of prosecution after the applicant failed to appear at the hearing.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not appear when the proceeding was called, the Court inferred that notice of the hearing had been sent to the applicant's email address, and registry inquiries confirmed no attendance by the applicant in person or by telephone; in those circumstances the Minister's application for dismissal for want of prosecution should be granted.
Court Disposition
Extension of time application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The extension of time application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs, of and incidental to the application, as fixed by the Registrar or agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment