Elka Simjanovska v Roads and Traffic Authority. [2007] NSWIRComm 23
Given the sensitive nature of the medical records, access by the respondent is to be limited to three nominated solicitors, subject to written undertakings of confidentiality and use solely for the proceedings, and delayed until after the applicant has had exclusive access until 14 February 2007.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application on Appeal
- Outcome
- order for access varied on appeal
- Legal Topics
- ['production of Documents' 'confidentiality' 'access to Medical Records' 'procedural Fairness']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the order for access to medical records produced on summons should be varied due to issues of confidentiality and the sensitive nature of documents' "Whether procedural fairness was accorded concerning the applicant's access to documents"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the sensitive nature of the medical records, access by the respondent is to be limited to three nominated solicitors, subject to written undertakings of confidentiality and use solely for the proceedings, and delayed until after the applicant has had exclusive access until 14 February 2007.
Court Disposition
order for access varied on appeal
Orders
- ['Access by the respondent to medical records produced on summons, including photocopying access, is granted only to three nominated solicitors for the respondent upon written confidentiality undertakings, to be used solely for proceedings.' "Respondent's access to be granted on or after 14 February 2007." 'No...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment