Ella Dorothy Egberts v Shelley Lee Evans & Anor [2018] NSWSC 1974
Court approved the settlement as proposed because it was reasonable, based on legal advice, did not favour some beneficiaries over others, and objections from non-executor beneficiaries were considered but not substantiated or pursued at hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Application / Settlement Approval Hearing
- Outcome
- Settlement approved; orders made in accordance with the agreement.
- Legal Topics
- ['family Provision' 'settlement Approval' 'beneficiary Rights']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Settlement Approval Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should approve the settlement reached between the executors and the Plaintiff.' 'Whether, and to what extent, the Court should give consideration to objections by non-executor beneficiaries to the settlement.']
Ratio Decidendi
Court approved the settlement as proposed because it was reasonable, based on legal advice, did not favour some beneficiaries over others, and objections from non-executor beneficiaries were considered but not substantiated or pursued at hearing.
Court Disposition
Settlement approved; orders made in accordance with the agreement.
Orders
- ['Orders in accordance with the Short Minutes of Order handed up by the Plaintiff and Defendants, initialled by the judge and dated with 15 November 2018.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment