Daher v R [2018] NSWCCA 287
The sentencing judge failed to properly assess objective seriousness by not considering relevant factors, particularly the quantity of drugs involved; given the relatively small quantity and limited scale, the objective seriousness was at the lower end. The Court therefore set aside the original sentence and imposed a lesser sentence, granting leave to appeal and allowing the appeal against sentence.
- Parties
- Applicant: Elle Louie Daher; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal against sentence allowed; sentence varied via re-sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeal Against Sentence, Objective Seriousness, Conditional Liberty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elle Louie Daher
Applicant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge failed to properly assess the objective seriousness of the offending
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in her assessment of the applicant's conditional liberty
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge failed to properly assess objective seriousness by not considering relevant factors, particularly the quantity of drugs involved; given the relatively small quantity and limited scale, the objective seriousness was at the lower end. The Court therefore set aside the original sentence and imposed a lesser sentence, granting leave to appeal and allowing the appeal against sentence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal against sentence allowed; sentence varied via re-sentencing
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal against sentence allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment