HOWARD v COLLIER [1996] NSWCA 254
The appeal is incompetent without leave, and s 57 of the Legal Aid Commission Act does not constrain the Court from dismissing the notice of motion as there are no valid proceedings presently before the Court.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ellena Howard; Respondent: Collier
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Motion to Adjourn/dismissal of Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- notice of motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Legal Aid, Summary Judgment, Stay of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Parties
Ellena Howard
Applicant
Collier
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Motion to Adjourn/dismissal of Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal is competent without leave
- 2 Whether s 57 of the Legal Aid Commission Act, 1979 requires adjournment of proceedings pending legal aid review
- 3 Whether the notice of motion should be struck out
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is incompetent without leave, and s 57 of the Legal Aid Commission Act does not constrain the Court from dismissing the notice of motion as there are no valid proceedings presently before the Court.
Court Disposition
notice of motion dismissed
Orders
- Notice of motion filed on 3 April 1996 dismissed.
- Applicant to pay respondent's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment