Elliot & Tuthill (Mortgages) Pty Ltd v Farrell & Anderson Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 965

Elliot & Tuthill (Mortgages) Pty Ltd v Farrell & Anderson Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 965

Given the ambiguity in the authorities and the evolving area of equitable contribution, it cannot be said that the proposed cross-claims are hopeless. As the law is in a process of further development and factual findings may affect obligations, leave to file the cross-claims should be granted and the respondents should not be precluded from advancing their claims.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 August 2002
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to File Cross Claims / Interlocutory Application – Leave to File Cross Claims
Outcome
Leave granted for respondents to file cross-claims.
Legal Topics
['cross Claims' 'equitable Contribution' 'negligence' 'trade Practices Act' 'leave to File Cross Claim']
['practice and Procedure' 'equity' 'commercial Law'] ['cross Claims' 'equitable Contribution' 'negligence' 'trade Practices Act' 'leave to File Cross Claim']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to File Cross Claims / Interlocutory Application – Leave to File Cross Claims

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether leave should be granted to file cross-claims against applicant's solicitors and directors for indemnity or contribution" 'Whether the proposed cross-claims disclose a viable cause of action, particularly in respect of equitable contribution for alleged negligence by the applicant’s solicitors and directors']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the ambiguity in the authorities and the evolving area of equitable contribution, it cannot be said that the proposed cross-claims are hopeless. As the law is in a process of further development and factual findings may affect obligations, leave to file the cross-claims should be granted and the respondents should not be precluded from advancing their claims.

Court Disposition

Leave granted for respondents to file cross-claims.

Orders

  • ['The respondents be granted leave to file cross‑claims in proceedings N1474/01, N1482/01, N1483/01 and N1484/01.' 'Costs will be reserved.']