Elna Australia Pty Ltd v. International Computers (Australia) Pty Ltd [1987] FCA 249
The Federal Court of Australia does not have power under Part IIIB of the Evidence Act 1905 or as a matter of inherent jurisdiction to issue a letter of request to a foreign court solely for the production of documents, as this is not 'the taking or causing to be taken the evidence' of the corporation within the sense of the statute; such power is statutory and does not extend to the discovery sought.
- Parties
- Applicant: ELNA Australia Pty Limited; Respondent: International Computers (Australia) Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion in Civil Proceeding / Application for Letter of Request—interlocutory Motion, Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Request, Inherent Jurisdiction, Production of Documents, Taking of Evidence Abroad
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ELNA Australia Pty Limited
Applicant
International Computers (Australia) Pty Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Civil Proceeding / Application for Letter of Request—interlocutory Motion, Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court of Australia has power under Part IIIB of the Evidence Act 1905 or inherent jurisdiction to make an order for issue of a letter of request to a foreign court for production of documents by a corporation not a party to the action
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court of Australia does not have power under Part IIIB of the Evidence Act 1905 or as a matter of inherent jurisdiction to issue a letter of request to a foreign court solely for the production of documents, as this is not 'the taking or causing to be taken the evidence' of the corporation within the sense of the statute; such power is statutory and does not extend to the discovery sought.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The motion be dismissed.
- The Applicant pay the Respondent's costs of the motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment