R v AMMARI [2010] NSWDC 301
Given the gravity, scale, and persistence of Ms Ammari's offending, including the breach of a suspended sentence for similar previous conduct and the significant loss caused to her employer, the need for punishment, general and specific deterrence, and the application of the principle of totality require the imposition of substantial concurrent and partially cumulative custodial sentences, discounted for her plea of guilty.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Ms Ammari is sentenced to a fixed term of eighteen months' imprisonment for the suspended sentence offence, and for the indictable offence is sentenced to a head sentence of three and a half years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of eighteen months. The overall effective sentence is a head sentence of four...
- Legal Topics
- ['embezzlement' 'sentencing' 'breach of Suspended Sentence' 'principle of Totality']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for Ms Ammari given her plea of guilty to embezzlement and the breach of a suspended sentence?' 'How should the principle of totality be applied in setting sentences for separate but related offences?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the gravity, scale, and persistence of Ms Ammari's offending, including the breach of a suspended sentence for similar previous conduct and the significant loss caused to her employer, the need for punishment, general and specific deterrence, and the application of the principle of totality require the imposition of substantial concurrent and partially cumulative custodial sentences, discounted for her plea of guilty.
Court Disposition
Ms Ammari is sentenced to a fixed term of eighteen months' imprisonment for the suspended sentence offence, and for the indictable offence is sentenced to a head sentence of three and a half years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of eighteen months. The overall effective sentence is a head sentence of four...
Orders
- ["Revocation of order for suspension concerning the Local Court offence of embezzlement; eighteen months' imprisonment from 7 October 2010 (fixed term)." "On the indicted offence, sentenced to three and a half years' imprisonment from 7 April 2011, with a non-parole period of eighteen months." "Overall effective...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment