Emerald Grain Australia Pty Ltd v Agrocorp International Pte Ltd [2014] FCA 414
The application failed because none of the findings challenged were made absent probative evidence; the Tribunal relied on material and submissions before it, and Emerald Grain did not demonstrate a breach of the hearing rule as required. The rules of natural justice were not violated in the context of international...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['set Aside of Arbitral Award' 'public Policy—natural Justice' 'application of UNCITRAL Model Law']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Originating Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the arbitral award conflicted with public policy of Australia under Article 34(2)(b)(ii) of the UNCITRAL Model Law' 'Whether the award contravened the rules of natural justice (no evidence and hearing rule)' 'Whether findings were made in absence of probative evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
The application failed because none of the findings challenged were made absent probative evidence; the Tribunal relied on material and submissions before it, and Emerald Grain did not demonstrate a breach of the hearing rule as required. The rules of natural justice were not violated in the context of international arbitration and the policy of upholding arbitral awards prevailed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment