EPA v Emerald Peat Pty Ltd (In Liq) [1999] NSWLEC 147
The defendant, by conducting peat mining operations which resulted in the discharge of clay-laden water into Wingecarribee Swamp and Reservoir over a continuous period from 4 August 1997 to 17 September 1997, caused physical and chemical changes in the waters contrary to s 16(1) and (7) of the Clean Waters Act 1970. The defendant acted in disregard of known risks and failed to take available remedial measures. The offending was found to be a continuing offence of significant seriousness, justifying substantial pecuniary penalties and an order for costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution for Environmental Offence / Judgment After Ex Parte Hearing Due to No Defence by Defendant
- Outcome
- Conviction; Fined with continuing penalty; Costs ordered against defendant
- Legal Topics
- ['water Pollution' 'continuing Offences' 'sentencing Under Environmental Offences and Penalties Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Prosecution for Environmental Offence / Judgment After Ex Parte Hearing Due to No Defence by Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant polluted waters contrary to s 16(1) and (7) of the Clean Waters Act 1970 and committed a continuing offence under the Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989' 'Whether the discharge of turbid, clay-laden water into protected waters caused physical and chemical changes constituting pollution' 'Determination of appropriate penalties and costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant, by conducting peat mining operations which resulted in the discharge of clay-laden water into Wingecarribee Swamp and Reservoir over a continuous period from 4 August 1997 to 17 September 1997, caused physical and chemical changes in the waters contrary to s 16(1) and (7) of the Clean Waters Act 1970. The defendant acted in disregard of known risks and failed to take available remedial measures. The offending was found to be a continuing offence of significant seriousness, justifying substantial pecuniary penalties and an order for costs.
Court Disposition
Conviction; Fined with continuing penalty; Costs ordered against defendant
Orders
- ['Defendant convicted of the offence as charged.' 'Defendant to pay a fine of $85,000.' 'Defendant to pay an additional penalty of $3,000 per day for 44 days (a total of $132,000 for continuing offence).' 'Aggregate fine and continuing penalty: $217,000.' "Defendant to pay prosecutor's costs in the sum of $89,925."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment