Ciuffeteli, E.L. v Miller, D. [1986] FCA 642
The trial judge erred in fixing the sum for future economic loss at $20,000, as the uncontested medical evidence indicated the appellant was unfit for heavy work and suffered a significant loss of earning capacity. The appropriate buffer to allow for the risk of missed employment opportunities given residual disabilities warranted an increased award for loss of earning capacity, raising the overall judgment from $127,473.28 to $157,473.28.
- Parties
- Appellant: Emidio Lucino Ciuffetelli; Respondent: David Miller
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Federal Court of Australia Appeal From Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Loss of Earning Capacity, General Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emidio Lucino Ciuffetelli
Appellant
David Miller
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Federal Court of Australia Appeal From Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the assessment of damages for past and future loss of earning capacity and general damages by the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory was inadequate and warrants variation.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred in fixing the sum for future economic loss at $20,000, as the uncontested medical evidence indicated the appellant was unfit for heavy work and suffered a significant loss of earning capacity. The appropriate buffer to allow for the risk of missed employment opportunities given residual disabilities warranted an increased award for loss of earning capacity, raising the overall judgment from $127,473.28 to $157,473.28.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Judgment of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory varied by increasing the award from $127,473.28 to $157,473.28.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment