Sullivan v Energy Services International Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 843
The liquidator acted unreasonably in issuing disclaimers and paid himself in priority to costs that should have been paid, warranting a personal costs order against him for the plaintiff's costs not paid by the company, including the plaintiff's costs payable to the third defendant.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Emily Sullivan t/as Sullivan's Transport and General Services; First Defendant: Energy Services International Pty Ltd; Second Defendant (liquidator): William Balfour Rangott
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Costs Application
- Outcome
- Costs order made against second defendant liquidator personally
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Liquidator's Personal Liability, Disclaimer of Property, Priority of Payments in Liquidation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emily Sullivan t/as Sullivan's Transport and General Services
Plaintiff
Energy Services International Pty Ltd
First Defendant
William Balfour Rangott
Second Defendant (liquidator)
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether voluntary liquidator should pay plaintiff's costs personally
- 2 Whether costs payable by the plaintiff to the third defendant should be paid by the voluntary liquidator
- 3 Priority of costs orders over liquidator's fees in winding up
Ratio Decidendi
The liquidator acted unreasonably in issuing disclaimers and paid himself in priority to costs that should have been paid, warranting a personal costs order against him for the plaintiff's costs not paid by the company, including the plaintiff's costs payable to the third defendant.
Court Disposition
Costs order made against second defendant liquidator personally
Orders
- The second defendant, being a voluntary liquidator, to pay personally costs of the plaintiff that were not paid by the first defendant, including the costs that the plaintiff is liable to pay to the third defendant.
- The costs include the costs of the present application on 1 August 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment