Murphy v David Jones Limited [2002] NSWADT 140
The applicant was discriminated against on grounds of race when a co-worker referred to him as 'boy', a term with racially derogatory connotations when used towards African Americans. No other allegations of discrimination or of victimisation were substantiated as there was insufficient evidence that treatment was on the ground of race or the making of a complaint.
- Parties
- Applicant: Emmett Joel Murphy Junior; Respondent: David Jones Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Race Discrimination and Victimisation (equal Opportunity) / Principal Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Partial success for the applicant; race discrimination on one ground substantiated; victimisation complaint dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination in Employment, Victimisation, Procedure Under Anti Discrimination Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emmett Joel Murphy Junior
Applicant
David Jones Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Race Discrimination and Victimisation (equal Opportunity) / Principal Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was discriminated against on the ground of race
- 2 Whether the applicant was victimised for alleging race discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was discriminated against on grounds of race when a co-worker referred to him as 'boy', a term with racially derogatory connotations when used towards African Americans. No other allegations of discrimination or of victimisation were substantiated as there was insufficient evidence that treatment was on the ground of race or the making of a complaint.
Court Disposition
Partial success for the applicant; race discrimination on one ground substantiated; victimisation complaint dismissed.
Orders
- The complaint of discrimination on the ground of race is substantiated as to one of the allegations made.
- The complaint of victimisation is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment