EMP v Children’s Guardian [2021] NSWCATAD 123
EMP does not pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, as established on the balance of probabilities after considering oral and written evidence, including the findings of the EPAC report, expert evidence, and statutory declarations. The Children's Guardian's refusal decision was not warranted, and EMP should be granted a Working with Children Check Clearance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application allowed; Respondent's decision set aside
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'disqualifying Offences' 'risk Assessment' 'tribunal Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether EMP poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety and well-being of children' 'Whether EMP should be granted a Working with Children Check Clearance']
Ratio Decidendi
EMP does not pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, as established on the balance of probabilities after considering oral and written evidence, including the findings of the EPAC report, expert evidence, and statutory declarations. The Children's Guardian's refusal decision was not warranted, and EMP should be granted a Working with Children Check Clearance.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; Respondent's decision set aside
Orders
- ["The decision of the Children's Guardian made on 13 November 2020 is set aside." "The Children's Guardian is to grant EMP a Working with Children Check Clearance forthwith."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment