Inspector Maddaford v Mulgoa Quarries and CSR Limited [2003] NSWIRComm 480

Inspector Maddaford v Mulgoa Quarries and CSR Limited [2003] NSWIRComm 480

Both defendants were aware or ought to have been aware that the practice of employees and drivers using a narrow, unguarded steel beam and support post as the means of access to a weighbridge computer was inherently unsafe and involved foreseeable risk of injury. The defendants failed to take reasonable steps to prevent this practice despite the risk being obvious and alternative safe means of access being available. On the facts and admissions, the offences were established, but since causation of death was not proven beyond reasonable doubt to result from the risk, the seriousness of the offence was not increased due to death.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Prosecution / Sentence and Orders Following Guilty Pleas
Outcome
Convictions entered on guilty pleas; fines imposed; orders for costs.
Legal Topics
['employer Duty of Care' 'workplace Safety' 'risk of Injury' 'prosecution for Breach of Safety Duty' 'workplace Fatality Procedures' 'sentencing and Penalties']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Prosecution / Sentence and Orders Following Guilty Pleas

  1. 1 ['Whether Mulgoa Quarries Pty Limited failed to ensure the health, safety and welfare at work of its employee contrary to s 15(1) Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983' 'Whether CSR Limited failed to ensure persons not in its employment were not exposed to risks arising from its undertaking at its place of work, contrary to s 16(1) Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983' 'Assessment of the gravity and foreseeability of risk and appropriate penalty where risk eventuated in fatality but doubt as to causation']

Ratio Decidendi

Both defendants were aware or ought to have been aware that the practice of employees and drivers using a narrow, unguarded steel beam and support post as the means of access to a weighbridge computer was inherently unsafe and involved foreseeable risk of injury. The defendants failed to take reasonable steps to prevent this practice despite the risk being obvious and alternative safe means of access being available. On the facts and admissions, the offences were established, but since causation of death was not proven beyond reasonable doubt to result from the risk, the seriousness of the offence was not increased due to death.

Court Disposition

Convictions entered on guilty pleas; fines imposed; orders for costs.

Orders

  • ["Mulgoa Quarries Pty Limited: Offence proven; convicted; fined $39,000 with moiety to prosecutor; to pay prosecutor's costs as agreed or as determined." "CSR Limited: Offence proven; convicted; fined $44,200 with moiety to prosecutor; to pay prosecutor's costs as agreed or as determined."]