Neil v McDonnell [1949] HCA 13

Neil v McDonnell [1949] HCA 13

The true construction of the will of William McDonald was that upon the death of the last life tenant (Grace), the corpus of the residuary estate was divisible as to one moiety to the appellant (Ena Gertrude Neil, only child of Emily), and the other moiety among the issue of Grace McDonnell (Stanley Augustine McDonnell, Ines Marie Augusta Campbell, and John Arthur Xavier McDonnell) equally between them. The terms and structure of the will supported separate moieties vesting in issue per stirpes, not in a single composite per capita class.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales in Equity
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Decretal order varied.
Legal Topics
['interpretation of Wills' 'construction of Trusts' 'distribution of Residuary Estate' 'per Stirpes Vs Per Capita Distribution']
['succession Law' 'wills and Estates'] ['interpretation of Wills' 'construction of Trusts' 'distribution of Residuary Estate' 'per Stirpes Vs Per Capita Distribution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales in Equity

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the corpus of the residuary estate of William McDonald was divisible per stirpes (by branch) or per capita (by head) among the issue of the testator's daughters; and when division of corpus occurred and among whom."]

Ratio Decidendi

The true construction of the will of William McDonald was that upon the death of the last life tenant (Grace), the corpus of the residuary estate was divisible as to one moiety to the appellant (Ena Gertrude Neil, only child of Emily), and the other moiety among the issue of Grace McDonnell (Stanley Augustine McDonnell, Ines Marie Augusta Campbell, and John Arthur Xavier McDonnell) equally between them. The terms and structure of the will supported separate moieties vesting in issue per stirpes, not in a single composite per capita class.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Decretal order varied.

Orders

  • ['Decretal order varied by striking out the declaration relating to per capita division and substituting a declaration that the corpus of the residuary estate is divisible since the death of Grace McDonnell, as to one moiety to the appellant and the other moiety among Stanley Augustine McDonnell, Ines Marie Augusta...