Endo Tecknik-Nord Pty Limited v Kiama Municipal Council [2008] NSWLEC 1332
The proposed fence and gate, as originally designed, were inconsistent with the rural character of the locality due to excessive height and bulk. Amendments to reduce height and visual impact, as agreed by the parties, appropriately balance the applicant's needs with landscape protection objectives, warranting...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal No 10253 dismissed; Appeal No 10254 allowed in part by consent (order modified)
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'front Fence Gate' 'streetscape Impact' 'character of Area' 's121 B Order' 'fence Removal']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the front fence and gate structure causes adverse streetscape impacts and is compatible with the rural character of the area' 'Whether the s121B Order for removal of the fence was lawful and appropriate']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed fence and gate, as originally designed, were inconsistent with the rural character of the locality due to excessive height and bulk. Amendments to reduce height and visual impact, as agreed by the parties, appropriately balance the applicant's needs with landscape protection objectives, warranting modification of the original order rather than unconditional approval or removal.
Court Disposition
Appeal No 10253 dismissed; Appeal No 10254 allowed in part by consent (order modified)
Orders
- ['Appeal No 10253 of 2008 is dismissed.' 'Order No. 2, issued on 27th February 2008 by Kiama Municipal Council, is modified to require the applicant to carry out works reducing the height of the gate and fence in accordance with the amended plan AO1 of 27/8/08, with completion by 18 December 2008.' 'No order as to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment