Application by Energex Limited (Distribution Ratio (Gamma)) (No 3) [2010] ACompT 9
The distribution ratio (gamma) is determined to be 0.7, as there is no empirical data supporting a higher ratio, and both parties agree that 0.7 is appropriate based on the materials before the Tribunal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Energex Limited; Applicant: Ergon Energy Corporation Limited; Applicant: ETSA Utilities; Respondent: Australian Energy Regulator
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Review of Distribution Determination / Reasons for Decision
- Outcome
- The Tribunal concludes that the distribution ratio is 0.7 for the calculation of gamma and directs the parties to confer and provide minutes of the appropriate determination.
- Legal Topics
- Distribution Determination, Gamma (distribution Ratio), Review Under Section 71 B of the National Electricity Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Energex Limited
Applicant
Ergon Energy Corporation Limited
Applicant
ETSA Utilities
Applicant
Australian Energy Regulator
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review of Distribution Determination / Reasons for Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 What distribution ratio (gamma) should be used in the calculation under the National Electricity Law?
Ratio Decidendi
The distribution ratio (gamma) is determined to be 0.7, as there is no empirical data supporting a higher ratio, and both parties agree that 0.7 is appropriate based on the materials before the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
The Tribunal concludes that the distribution ratio is 0.7 for the calculation of gamma and directs the parties to confer and provide minutes of the appropriate determination.
Orders
- The parties are directed to confer and provide minutes of the appropriate determination to be made by 4:00pm on Monday 31 January 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment