Application by Energex Limited (No 4) [2011] ACompT 4
The Tribunal holds that leave to apply for review should only be granted in respect of grounds which raise a serious issue to be heard and determined, and that for the financial threshold under s 71F(2), aggregation is permissible only for grounds meeting the serious issue threshold, in accordance with the legislative history and purpose of the National Electricity Law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Review Regulatory Determination / Decision on Statutory Interpretation of Threshold Provisions
- Outcome
- Statutory interpretation clarified as to proper construction of ss 71E and 71F of the NEL; no further directions required.
- Legal Topics
- ['merits Review of Regulatory Determinations' 'materiality Threshold' 'statutory Interpretation' 'leave to Apply for Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Review Regulatory Determination / Decision on Statutory Interpretation of Threshold Provisions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Proper construction of sections 71E and 71F of the National Electricity Law' 'Application of materiality and financial threshold in leave applications for review' 'Role of purposive vs textualist statutory interpretation in energy regulation']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal holds that leave to apply for review should only be granted in respect of grounds which raise a serious issue to be heard and determined, and that for the financial threshold under s 71F(2), aggregation is permissible only for grounds meeting the serious issue threshold, in accordance with the legislative history and purpose of the National Electricity Law.
Court Disposition
Statutory interpretation clarified as to proper construction of ss 71E and 71F of the NEL; no further directions required.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment