Rosebanner Pty Ltd & Anor v EnergyAustralia (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 150
The offer of compromise made by the respondent at trial was persuasive because the main issues on appeal were substantially the same as at trial, the appellants were unsuccessful at both stages, and their challenge to factual findings lacked substance. Therefore, the respondent was entitled to indemnity costs of the appeal. An order to change the respondent's name was also proper due to a legislative change.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment: Determination of Costs and Change of Name Order
- Outcome
- Appellants ordered to pay respondent’s costs of the appeal on an indemnity basis; leave given to amend the respondent’s name
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'offers of Compromise' 'indemnity Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment: Determination of Costs and Change of Name Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent is entitled to costs of the appeal on an indemnity basis due to a pre-trial offer of compromise' "Whether an order should be made to amend the respondent's name in the proceedings"]
Ratio Decidendi
The offer of compromise made by the respondent at trial was persuasive because the main issues on appeal were substantially the same as at trial, the appellants were unsuccessful at both stages, and their challenge to factual findings lacked substance. Therefore, the respondent was entitled to indemnity costs of the appeal. An order to change the respondent's name was also proper due to a legislative change.
Court Disposition
Appellants ordered to pay respondent’s costs of the appeal on an indemnity basis; leave given to amend the respondent’s name
Orders
- ['Leave to amend to change the name of the respondent in the title of court documents to Ausgrid.' "The appellants to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal on an indemnity basis." "The appellants to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment