ENS v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2022] NSWCATAD 364
The Tribunal determined that the applicant's participant description and dispute summary in mediation documents were accurate, relevant, up to date and not misleading for the purposes of IPPs 8 and 9 under the PPIP Act; therefore, the agency was not required to amend records and no contravention occurred.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review Application / Final Determination
- Outcome
- No action taken
- Legal Topics
- ['privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (nsw)' 'administrative Decisions Review' 'information Protection Principles' 'mediation in Strata Schemes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review Application / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the agency contravened Information Protection Principles (IPPs) 8 and 9 by failing to amend or correct personal information and summaries regarding the applicant's capacity and the dispute" "Whether the agency's description of the applicant's intentions in mediation constituted inaccurate or misleading personal information under the PPIP Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined that the applicant's participant description and dispute summary in mediation documents were accurate, relevant, up to date and not misleading for the purposes of IPPs 8 and 9 under the PPIP Act; therefore, the agency was not required to amend records and no contravention occurred.
Court Disposition
No action taken
Orders
- ['The Tribunal determines not to take any action on the matter.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment