Ensham Resources Pty Limited v AIOI Insurance Company Limited [2012] FCA 822
Given the likelihood of duplication of arguments, the substantive nature of the privilege issues, and their general importance, it is efficient and appropriate that the application for leave to appeal be heard and determined by a Full Court and that it be heard at the same time as any appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal to be heard and determined by a Full Court; application for leave to appeal to be heard at the same time as any appeal; costs in the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Appeals' 'legal Professional Privilege' 'case Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application for leave to appeal should be heard and determined by a Full Court under s 25(2)(e) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)' 'Whether the application for leave to appeal should be heard concurrently with the appeal' 'Whether the primary judge correctly determined issues relating to legal professional privilege over loss adjuster’s reports' 'Relevance of the duty of utmost good faith under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) to privilege']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the likelihood of duplication of arguments, the substantive nature of the privilege issues, and their general importance, it is efficient and appropriate that the application for leave to appeal be heard and determined by a Full Court and that it be heard at the same time as any appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal to be heard and determined by a Full Court; application for leave to appeal to be heard at the same time as any appeal; costs in the appeal.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 25(2)(e) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), the application for leave to appeal be heard and determined by a Full Court.' 'Subject to any contrary direction by the Full Court, the application for leave to appeal is to be heard at the same time as any appeal.' 'Costs be costs in the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment