Lymlind Pty Ltd & Ors v Parianos, George & Anor Parianos George v Parianos, Anagyros & Anor [1997] FCA 661
Because the accounting material and Swiss bank documentation had been verified to the Court's satisfaction and the first respondent accepted the calculation subject only to a limited reservation about a recently communicated correction, judgment should be entered for the applicants against the first respondent for Swiss francs 1,336,584.98 with interest at the daily rate of Swiss francs 172.77 from 11 July 1997 until payment. The operation of that order should be suspended until 16 July 1997, with liberty to apply on 24 hours' written notice, to allow the first respondent to agitate any aspect of the correction if necessary. A further declaratory order was unnecessary; judgment for the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application and Cross Claim / Reasons for Judgment on Making of Further Orders After Orders Made on 12 July 1995
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the applicants against the first respondent, with operation of the judgment order suspended up to and including 16 July 1997 and liberty to apply on 24 hours' written notice.
- Legal Topics
- ['entry of Judgment Following Accounting Material' 'interest on Judgment Amount' 'suspension of Operation of Order' 'declaratory Relief' 'reservation of Liberty to Apply']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application and Cross Claim / Reasons for Judgment on Making of Further Orders After Orders Made on 12 July 1995
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether judgment should be entered for the applicants against the first respondent for Swiss francs 1,336,584.98 with interest at the daily rate of Swiss francs 172.77 from 11 July 1997 until payment.' "Whether the operation of the judgment order should be suspended to allow the first respondent's experts a reasonable opportunity to consider a recently communicated correction to the applicants' profit calculations." 'Whether a further declaratory order should be made stating that, after making all proper allowances, the first respondent was liable to pay the second and third applicants the stated amount.' 'Whether the making of the present orders precluded the first respondent from raising issues about certain bank accounts in subsequent proceedings.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the accounting material and Swiss bank documentation had been verified to the Court's satisfaction and the first respondent accepted the calculation subject only to a limited reservation about a recently communicated correction, judgment should be entered for the applicants against the first respondent for Swiss francs 1,336,584.98 with interest at the daily rate of Swiss francs 172.77 from 11 July 1997 until payment. The operation of that order should be suspended until 16 July 1997, with liberty to apply on 24 hours' written notice, to allow the first respondent to agitate any aspect of the correction if necessary. A further declaratory order was unnecessary; judgment for the...
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the applicants against the first respondent, with operation of the judgment order suspended up to and including 16 July 1997 and liberty to apply on 24 hours' written notice.
Orders
- ['Judgment for the applicants against the first respondent for Swiss Francs 1,336,584.98 together with interest at the daily rate of Swiss Francs 172.77 from 11 July 1997 until payment.' 'Suspend the operation of order 1 up to and including 16 July 1997 reserving liberty to any party to apply in this connection upon...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment