Norman, in the matter of Forest Enterprises Australia Limited (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers & Managers Appointed) v FEA Plantations Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers Appointed) (No 2) [2011] FCA 20
Because no orders had been entered, the plaintiffs could not file a notice of appeal, and orders needed to be entered to enable any appeal to be resolved in a timely manner; as the plaintiffs sought dismissal of the application with liberty to apply and costs reserved, and the other parties agreed, those orders were made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Orders Following Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- The application was dismissed; costs were reserved; liberty to apply was granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['entry of Orders' 'appeal' 'costs Reserved' 'liberty to Apply' 'administration and Receivership']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Orders Following Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What orders should be made after the parties were unable to agree on orders following the reasons published on 21 December 2010.' 'Whether orders should be entered to enable the plaintiffs to file a notice of appeal.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because no orders had been entered, the plaintiffs could not file a notice of appeal, and orders needed to be entered to enable any appeal to be resolved in a timely manner; as the plaintiffs sought dismissal of the application with liberty to apply and costs reserved, and the other parties agreed, those orders were made.
Court Disposition
The application was dismissed; costs were reserved; liberty to apply was granted.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' 'Costs be reserved.' 'There be liberty to apply.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment