Application by Envestra Limited (No 2) [2012] ACompT 4
The Australian Energy Regulator committed reviewable error by averaging the extrapolated Bloomberg curve value with the APA bond without sufficient regard to all relevant material and expert evidence. The debt risk premium should be determined solely by reference to the extrapolated Bloomberg value (4.67%). No reviewable error was made in the determination of the market risk premium; the AER's decision to set the value at 6% was reasonably open to it and supported by evidence.
- Parties
- Applicant: Envestra Limited; Respondent: Australian Energy Regulator
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of Regulatory Decision / Final Determination of Review
- Outcome
- Varied and affirmed in part
- Legal Topics
- Access Arrangements, Rate of Return, Debt Risk Premium, Market Risk Premium, Regulatory Discretion, National Gas Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Envestra Limited
Applicant
Australian Energy Regulator
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Regulatory Decision / Final Determination of Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Australian Energy Regulator correctly determined the debt risk premium for Envestra's Queensland gas distribution network
- 2 Whether the Australian Energy Regulator correctly determined the market risk premium for the purposes of calculating the cost of equity
- 3 Whether the Australian Energy Regulator made any reviewable error under section 246(1) of the National Gas Law
Ratio Decidendi
The Australian Energy Regulator committed reviewable error by averaging the extrapolated Bloomberg curve value with the APA bond without sufficient regard to all relevant material and expert evidence. The debt risk premium should be determined solely by reference to the extrapolated Bloomberg value (4.67%). No reviewable error was made in the determination of the market risk premium; the AER's decision to set the value at 6% was reasonably open to it and supported by evidence.
Court Disposition
Varied and affirmed in part
Orders
- The Access Arrangement Decision is varied by replacing 3.81% for the debt risk premium with 4.67% for purposes of calculating the cost of debt.
- The Access Arrangement Decision relating to the market risk premium for calculating the cost of equity is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment