Environa Studio v Parramatta CC [2006] NSWLEC 251
The proposed development is permissible with consent, meets essential planning controls (except for minor technical non-compliance with storey height), is consistent with the objectives of the Residential 2(b) zone, and the objections do not attract determinative weight; the appeal is upheld and development consent is granted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Environa Studio; Respondent: Parramatta City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Demolition of Dwelling Houses, Removal of Trees, Multi Unit Housing, Neighbour Amenity, Character of Neighbourhood, Traffic and Parking
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Environa Studio
Applicant
Parramatta City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the development application complies with Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2001 and State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1
- 2 Whether the proposal is consistent with the objectives of the Residential 2(b) zone
- 3 Whether minor technical non-compliance in building height warrants refusal
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed development is permissible with consent, meets essential planning controls (except for minor technical non-compliance with storey height), is consistent with the objectives of the Residential 2(b) zone, and the objections do not attract determinative weight; the appeal is upheld and development consent is granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- Development Application No. 1427/04 for demolition of existing buildings and construction of multi-unit housing development at 64–66 Moffatts Drive, Dundas is granted subject to conditions in Annexure 'A'
- Exhibits 1, 3, A and C are retained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment